Colorful illustration of people outside in public.
Illustration: Kieran Blakey

The Nuance

Herd Immunity May Play a Bigger Role Than We Thought

Going forward, hard-hit communities could enjoy a measure of immunity-derived protection

Elemental
Published in
7 min readAug 27, 2020

--

During the first months of the pandemic, so-called herd immunity was a hot topic of conversation among public-health officials, politicians, and the media. The term refers to the percentage of people within a population that must have immunity to a virus in order to effectively retard or block its spread.

Early on, most experts estimated that the herd immunity threshold for SARS-CoV-2 was somewhere north of 60%, meaning that 60% or more of the population would need to develop immunity — either via vaccine or infection — in order to snuff out the virus. But those early estimates were based on incomplete data and overly simplistic statistical models — limitations that most infectious disease experts were quick to highlight at the time.

A lot of the data on the novel coronavirus remains incomplete. For example, researchers still don’t know just how infectious SARS-CoV-2 really is or how long immunity lasts following an infection. These two pieces of information are crucial inputs when it comes to accurately modeling herd immunity thresholds. Further complicating matters: The answers to both of these questions may vary…

--

--

Elemental
Elemental

Published in Elemental

Elemental is a former publication from Medium for science-backed health and wellness coverage. Currently inactive and not taking submissions.

Markham Heid
Markham Heid

Written by Markham Heid

I’m a frequent contributor at TIME, the New York Times, and other media orgs. I write mostly about health and science. I like long walks and the Grateful Dead.