The Scientific Quest to Erase Fatness Is Wrong

Let’s be careful about how we define ‘progress’

Eat for your health and the next generation. Illustration courtesy of the author

This is a story of another time, of a plausible future 30 years from now, give or take, in which the human experience of life and health (and perhaps even of who we are) will unfold unlike anything known before. The citizens of this future will learn early in life — through some combination of next-next-next-generation genetic testing and intelligence gleaned from their smart accessories — whether they are heading toward disease: depression, dementia, diabetes, what have you. More important, they will be offered an exit strategy.

This is the opening of a January 2020 article in UCSF Magazine. It discusses the potentials of several in-progress genomic research initiatives intended to further various disease treatments and preventative measures. It also mentions different ethical viewpoints on the potential dangers of therapies, like germline engineering, capable of manufacturing intergenerational genetic changes. Imagine designer babies and designer grandbabies and designer great-grandbabies — whole designer family tree branches, if you will.

I returned to this story after seeing a recent article in Science Translational Medicine about a potential CRISPR-Cas9 therapy for “obesity” from an international team affiliated with Harvard…